William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
Ed Rendell, Democratic governor of Pennsylvania, and former chairman of the Democratic National Committee, complained last week that Barack Obama didn't have administrative experience, and that this was contributing to his sluggishness of his handling of the Illinois governor saga. Rendell was right. The scandal, which involves the governor soliciting favors and funds in exchange for Obama's abandoned Senate seat, continues, with bits of information coming out each day. The classic way to handle a scandal is to get everything out as quickly as possible, punish those who should be punished, and put it behind you. Thus far, Obama has been disappointing. This morning The Wall Street Journal, which has done fine reporting on this story, reveals contacts between Rahm Emanuel, Obama's designated White House chief of staff, and the governor's office, regarding the Senate seat:
Associates? We can speculate that Emanuel may want some of this information out there, and is going around the Obama information operation to put the best possible spin on the story. Also, please note that there is nothing improper about holding discussions with a governor's office about filling a Senate seat.
An aide to Obama speaking with aides to the governor. Some real spin here, I suspect. Aides may not know everything. Aides may not be "authorized" to do certain things. Lots of deniability in what's leaking out.
Correct. Nothing improper about that, legally or morally.
But that's not the issue, and all the spin in the world can't protect Emanuel or Obama from the central question: What did they know about the governor's attempts to extract bribes for the Senate appointment, and when did they know it? Rahm Emanuel was elected to the House, succeeding Blagojevich, who'd held the seat until his election as governor. The two have had contact over the years. The information in this Journal story provides pieces of the puzzle, but the puzzle still has many holes to be filled. This will go on as long as the president-elect does not or cannot answer basic questions about what was known regarding the bribe attempts. Suggestion: The president-elect should appoint a person of impeccable reputation to investigate the actions of his staff and make a full, public report. But he's got to do something to get this behind him. December 15, 2008. |